Advertisement
Editorial
JAMA. 1982;247(7):1027-1028. doi: 10.1001/jama.1982.03320320063036

Infant Mortality Reexamined

  1. Nigel Paneth, MD, MPH
  1. Columbia University New York State Department of Mental Hygiene New York

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.

Excerpt

Comparisons of the infant mortality rates of different countries have a long and not especially noble history, political mudslinging often taking precedence over scientific inquiry. The United States has traditionally fared poorly in such comparisons, although lately the Soviet Union, whose infant mortality may actually be on the rise, has been a more prominent target of the political diatribe.1

As infant mortality is closely tied to indices of social disadvantage, it is nonetheless paradoxical that the United States, for all its industrial wealth and technological resources, can do no better than a tie for 16th in the international infant mortality rankings.2 There is no consensus as to why this is so, and it has never been clear what role medical care, or its lack, plays in it.

However, a spate of recent work, of which the article by Erickson and Bjerkedal in this issue (p 987) is an

Footnotes

  • Address editorial communications to the Editor, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals