Advertisement
Editorial
JAMA. 1992;267(16):2238-2239. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03480160096043

Accuracy in Recorded Diagnoses

  1. Stephen F. Jencks, MD
  1. From the Health Standards and Quality Bureau, Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, Md.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.

Excerpt

Although making accurate diagnoses is a critical clinical skill, putting accurate diagnoses on the face sheet of a medical record does not have the same priority for most physicians. Even those who see recording a correct principal diagnosis as an important part of good clinical thinking are unlikely to be perfectionists regarding additional diagnoses because it is hard to see that they will have any effect on patient care.

See also p 2197.

In the last few years, however, major journals have published a growing number of articles in which recorded additional diagnoses play an important part in analysis, either to establish a clinical point or to assess additional diagnoses as a measure of clinical severity of illness. Investigators seek to secure information from additional diagnoses, which would otherwise require costly manual abstraction, about the occurrence of adverse events and the risk of outcomes such as death. In addition, hospital

Footnotes

  • The views herein are the author's and not necessarily those of the Health Care Financing Administration.

  • Reprints not available.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals