Advertisement
Original Contribution
JAMA. 1998;279(17):1351-1357. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.17.1351

Improving the Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Results From the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project

  1. Thomas A. Marciniak, MD;
  2. Edward F. Ellerbeck, MD;
  3. Martha J. Radford, MD;
  4. Timothy F. Kresowik, MD;
  5. Jay A. Gold, MD;
  6. Harlan M. Krumholz, MD;
  7. Catarina I. Kiefe, MD, PhD;
  8. Richard M. Allman, MD;
  9. Robert A. Vogel, MD;
  10. Stephen F. Jencks, MD
  1. From the Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, Md (Drs Marciniak and Jencks); the Iowa Foundation for Medical Care, Des Moines (Drs Ellerbeck and Kresowik); the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (Dr Ellerbeck); the Connecticut Peer Review Organization, Middletown (Drs Radford and Krumholz); the Division of Cardiology, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Dr Radford); the Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Kresowik); MetaStar Inc, Madison, Wis, and the Department of Preventive Medicine and the Health Policy Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (Dr Gold); the Cardiovascular Section, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Krumholz); the Alabama Quality Assurance Foundation and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham (Drs Kiefe and Allman); the Division of Preventive Medicine (Dr Kiefe) and the Center for Aging (Dr Allman), University of Alabama at Birmingham; and the Department of Cardiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Dr Vogel).

Abstract

Context.— Medicare has a legislative mandate for quality assurance, but the effectiveness of its population-based quality improvement programs has been difficult to establish.

Objective.— To improve the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Design.— Quality improvement project with baseline measurement, feedback, remeasurement, and comparison samples.

Setting.— All acute care hospitals in the United States.

Patients.— Preintervention and postintervention samples included all Medicare patients in Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa, and Wisconsin discharged with principal diagnoses of acute myocardial infarctions during 2 periods, June 1992 through December 1992 and August 1995 through November 1995. Indicator comparisons were made with a random sample of Medicare patients in the rest of the nation discharged with acute myocardial infarctions from August 1995 through November 1995. Mortality comparisons involved all Medicare patients nationwide with inpatient claims for acute myocardial infarctions during 2 periods, June 1992 through May 1993 and August 1995 through July 1996.

Intervention.— Data feedback by peer review organizations.

Main Outcome Measures.— Quality indicators derived from clinical practice guidelines, length of stay, and mortality.

Results.— Performance on all quality indicators improved significantly in the 4 pilot states. Administration of aspirin during hospitalization in patients without contraindications improved from 84% to 90% (P<.001), and prescription of β-blockers at discharge improved from 47% to 68% (P<.001). Mortality at 30 days decreased from 18.9% to 17.1% (P=.005) and at 1 year from 32.3% to 29.6% (P<.001). These improvements in quality occurred during a period when median length of stay decreased from 8 days to 6 days. Performance on all quality indicators except reperfusion was better in the pilot states than in the rest of the nation in 1995, and the differences were statistically significant for aspirin use at discharge (P<.001), β-blocker use (P<.001), and smoking cessation counseling (P=.02). Postinfarction mortality was not significantly different between the pilot states and the rest of the nation during the baseline period, although it was slightly but significantly better in the pilot states during the follow-up period (absolute mortality difference at 1 year, 0.9%; P=.004).

Conclusions.— The quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction has improved in the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot states. Performance on the defined quality indicators appeared to be better in the pilot states than in the rest of the nation in 1995 and was associated with reduced mortality.

Related articles

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals