Advertisement
Original Contribution
JAMA. 2002;288(10):1252-1259. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.10.1252

Plasma Natriuretic Peptides for Community Screening for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Systolic Dysfunction

The Framingham Heart Study

  1. Ramachandran S. Vasan, MD;
  2. Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM;
  3. Martin G. Larson, ScD;
  4. Eric P. Leip, MS;
  5. Thomas J. Wang, MD;
  6. Peter W. F. Wilson, MD;
  7. Daniel Levy, MD
  1. Author Affiliations: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Mass (Drs Vasan, Benjamin, Larson, Wang, Wilson, and Levy, and Mr Leip); Sections of Cardiology (Drs Vasan and Benjamin) and Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology (Drs Vasan, Benjamin, Larson, and Levy), and Endocrinology Division (Dr Wilson), Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Wang); Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Levy); and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (Dr Levy).

Abstract

Context  Several reports have suggested the usefulness of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a screening test for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Prior studies were limited by small sample sizes and selection bias and none compared the diagnostic performance of these peptides in men and women.

Objectives  To examine the usefulness of natriuretic peptides for screening for elevated LV mass and LVSD in the community.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Community-based prospective cohort study of 3177 participants (1707 women) from the Framingham Study who attended a routine examination in 1995-1998.

Main Outcome Measures  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios for identifying elevated LV mass (sex-specific 90th percentile or higher of LV mass/[height]2), LVSD (ejection fraction ≤50% and/or fractional shortening <29%), and moderate to severe LVSD (ejection fraction ≤40% and/or fractional shortening <22%) at different discrimination limits of plasma BNP and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-ANP), with echocardiography as the criterion standard.

Results  The areas under the ROC curves for elevated LV mass or LVSD were at or below 0.75 for both peptides, were higher for men compared with women, and were similar for BNP and NT-ANP. The diagnostic performance of natriuretic peptides for LVSD improved in women but not in men when select high-risk subgroups were targeted. Discrimination limits based on high specificity (0.95) yielded better positive predictive values and likelihood ratios compared with age- and sex-specific reference limits yet only identified less than one third of participants who had elevated LV mass or LVSD.

Conclusion  In our large community-based sample, the performance of BNP and NT-ANP for detection of elevated LV mass and LVSD was suboptimal, suggesting limited usefulness of natriuretic peptides as mass screening tools.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals