Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training and Motor Cortex Activation in Chronic Stroke
A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Andreas R. Luft, MD;
- Sandy McCombe-Waller, PT, PhD;
- Jill Whitall, PhD;
- Larry W. Forrester, PhD;
- Richard Macko, MD;
- John D. Sorkin, MD, PhD;
- Jörg B. Schulz, MD;
- Andrew P. Goldberg, MD;
- Daniel F. Hanley, MD
- Author Affiliations: Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine (Drs Luft, Macko, Sorkin, Goldberg, and Hanley), Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science (Drs McCombe-Waller, Whitall, and Forrester), and Department of Neurology (Drs Forrester and Macko), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore; Division of Brain Injury Outcome, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (Drs Luft and Hanley); Department of General Neurology, Hertie Institute forClinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (Drs Luft and Schulz); and Baltimore Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Baltimore (Drs McCombe-Waller, Whitall, Forrester, Macko, Sorkin, Goldberg, and Hanley).
- Corresponding Author: Jill Whitall, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, 100 Penn St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (Jwhitall{at}som.umaryland.edu).
Abstract
Context Reorganization in central motor networks occurs during early recovery from hemiparetic stroke. In chronic stroke survivors, specific rehabilitation therapy can improve upper extremity function.
Objective To test the hypothesis that in patients who have chronic motor impairment following stroke, specific rehabilitation therapy that improves arm function is associated with reorganization of cortical networks.
Design, Setting, and Patients A randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in a US ambulatory rehabilitation program with 21 patients (median [IQR], 50.3 [34.8-77.3] months after unilateral stroke). Data were collected between 2001 and 2004.
Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) (n = 9) or standardized dose-matched therapeutic exercises (DMTE) (n = 12). Both were conducted for 1 hour, 3 times a week, for 6 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures Within 2 weeks before and after the intervention, brain activation during elbow movement assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional outcome assessed using arm function scores.
Results Patients in the BATRAC group but not in the DMTE group increased hemispheric activation during paretic arm movement (P = .03). Changes in activation were observed in the contralesional cerebrum and ipsilesional cerebellum (P = .009). BATRAC was associated with significant increases in activation in precentral (P<.001) and postcentral gyri (P = .03) and the cerebellum (P<.001), although 3 BATRAC patients showed no fMRI changes. Considering all patients, there were no differences in functional outcome between groups. When only BATRAC patients with fMRI response were included (n = 6), BATRAC improved arm function more than DMTE did (P = .02).
Conclusions These preliminary findings suggest that BATRAC induces reorganization in contralesional motor networks and provide biological plausibility for repetitive bilateral training as a potential therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation in hemiparetic stroke.
