Advertisement
Letters
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2435-2436. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2435-b

Treatment of Chronic Insomnia With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Zopiclone

  1. Gerson T. Lesser, MD
  1. glesser@jhha.org
    Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development
    Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    New York, NY

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.

To the Editor: In the study of CBT vs zopiclone for treatment of chronic primary insomnia by Dr Sivertsen and colleagues,1 I believe that there are problems relating to methodology and interpretation that limit the usefulness of their results for the medical practitioner.

The authors do not discuss a serious intrinsic bias in selecting community volunteers. Persons with insomnia may be initially seen by a physician and prescribed a hypnotic medication. For many the hypnotic may be reasonably successful and therefore continued in controlled doses regularly or episodically for years to decades. Members of this “therapeutically successful” cohort would be unlikely to volunteer for an insomnia study.

It seems unlikely that in the United States (and presumably in Norway) very many individuals with insomnia are initially referred for the more complex and costly CBT. Thus, the method of subject selection in Sivertsen et al1 likely excluded persons for …

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals