Advertisement
Original Contribution
JAMA. 2006;296(8):935-942. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.8.935

Comparison of Fixed-Dose Weight-Adjusted Unfractionated Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Acute Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

  1. Clive Kearon, MB, PhD;
  2. Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD;
  3. Jim A. Julian, MMath;
  4. James Douketis, MD;
  5. Susan Solymoss, MD;
  6. Paul Ockelford, MD;
  7. Sharon Jackson, MD;
  8. Alexander G. Turpie, MB;
  9. Betsy MacKinnon, MSc;
  10. Jack Hirsh, MD;
  11. Michael Gent, DSc;
  12. for the Fixed-Dose Heparin (FIDO) Investigators
  1. Author Affiliations: McMaster University and the Henderson Research Centre, Hamilton, Ontario (Drs Kearon, Ginsberg, Douketis, Turpie, Hirsh, and Gent, Mr Julian, and Ms MacKinnon); McGill University, Montreal, Quebec (Dr Solymoss); and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (Drs Ockelford and Jackson).
  1. Corresponding Author: Clive Kearon, MB, PhD, Hamilton Health Sciences, Henderson Division, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 1C3 (kearonc{at}mcmaster.ca).

Abstract

Context  When unfractionated heparin is used to treat acute venous thromboembolism, it is usually administered by intravenous infusion with coagulation monitoring, which requires hospitalization. However, subcutaneous administration of fixed-dose, weight-adjusted, unfractionated heparin may be suitable for inpatient and outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Objective  To determine if fixed-dose, weight-adjusted, subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is as effective and safe as low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Randomized, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, noninferiority trial of 708 patients aged 18 years or older with acute venous thromboembolism from 6 university-affiliated clinical centers in Canada and New Zealand conducted from September 1998 through February 2004. Of the randomized patients, 11 were subsequently excluded from the analysis of efficacy and 8 from the analysis of safety.

Interventions  Unfractionated heparin was administered subcutaneously as an initial dose of 333 U/kg, followed by a fixed dose of 250 U/kg every 12 hours (n = 345). Low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin or enoxaparin) was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 100 IU/kg every 12 hours (n = 352). Both treatments could be administered out of hospital and both were overlapped with 3 months of warfarin therapy.

Main Outcome Measures  Recurrent venous thromboembolism within 3 months and major bleeding within 10 days of randomization.

Results  Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 13 patients in the unfractionated heparin group (3.8%) compared with 12 patients in the low-molecular-weight heparin group (3.4%; absolute difference, 0.4%; 95% confidence interval, −2.6% to 3.3%). Major bleeding during the first 10 days of treatment occurred in 4 patients in the unfractionated heparin group (1.1%) compared with 5 patients in the low-molecular-weight heparin group (1.4%; absolute difference, −0.3%; 95% confidence interval, −2.3% to 1.7%). Treatment was administered entirely out of hospital in 72% of the unfractionated heparin group and 68% of the low-molecular-weight heparin group.

Conclusion  Fixed-dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is as effective and safe as low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism and is suitable for outpatient treatment.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182403

Related article

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals