Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic
-
jbarry@tulane.edu
Center for Bioenvironmental Research
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana
Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.
To the Editor: I believe that the study by Dr Markel and colleagues1 of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic and the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions has a serious problem in its data that calls its conclusions into question. The authors assert that, of 43 cities in the study, New York City intervened the earliest, on September 18, 1918, at “−11” (11 days before excess deaths doubled the baseline), 6 days earlier than the second earliest city. Because New York City had a relatively benign experience, this assertion contributes to the conclusion that nonpharmaceutical interventions were effective.
However, I am aware of no evidence that New York City ever took any action that meets the authors' definition of a nonpharmaceutical intervention: school closure, cancellation of public gatherings, and isolation and quarantine.1 The city never closed schools and never cancelled public gatherings. New York City health commissioner Royal Copeland did tell …
