Testing Protocols in the Intensive Care Unit
Complex Trials of Complex Interventions for Complex Patients
- Jean-Daniel Chiche, MD;
- Derek C. Angus, MD, MPH
- Author Affiliations: Department of Critical Care Medicine, AP-HP, Hopital Cochin, University René Descartes, Paris, France (Dr Chiche); CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Angus). Dr Angus is Contributing Editor, JAMA.
Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.
- KEYWORDS:
- CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC
- CRITICAL CARE
- INTENSIVE CARE UNITS
- POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION
- RESEARCH DESIGN
- RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL
- RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT
- TIDAL VOLUME
In this issue of JAMA, Meade and colleagues1 and Mercat and colleagues2 report the results of 2 large international trials of alternative strategies for setting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ventilated patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Both trials asked whether higher PEEP would reduce mortality, and both concluded it did not. Many readers not familiar with intensive care might reasonably wonder why such a seemingly innocuous intervention would deserve such attention, but the story behind PEEP is a long one, and these latest, largest trials do not provide a conclusion. They do, however, serve to demonstrate that answering even the simplest questions can become an endeavor of immense proportions.
Mechanical ventilation is lifesaving for patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome, but the ventilator can injure the lung, causing a condition known as ventilator-induced lung injury.3 The most …
