JAMA -- Table of Contents (Vol. 263 No. 10, March 9, 1990)

You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

Table of Contents

ARTICLES

Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, Ill
JAMA. 1990;263:1317-1441.

Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism
D. A. Kronick
JAMA. 1990;263:1321-1322.
ABSTRACT

The evolution of editorial peer review
J. C. Burnham
JAMA. 1990;263:1323-1329.
ABSTRACT

The communities of scientists and journal peer review
E. Knoll
JAMA. 1990;263:1330-1332.

Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review?
A. Yankauer
JAMA. 1990;263:1338-1340.
ABSTRACT

What do peer reviewers do?
S. Lock; J. Smith
JAMA. 1990;263:1341-1343.
ABSTRACT

Editorial peer review in US medical journals
A. C. Weller
JAMA. 1990;263:1344-1347.
ABSTRACT

Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences
L. L. Hargens
JAMA. 1990;263:1348-1352.
ABSTRACT

Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem
J. T. Evans; H. I. Nadjari; S. A. Burchell
JAMA. 1990;263:1353-1354.
ABSTRACT

An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal
M. J. Gardner; J. Bond
JAMA. 1990;263:1355-1357.
ABSTRACT

Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts
J. M. Garfunkel; M. H. Ulshen; H. J. Hamrick; E. E. Lawson
JAMA. 1990;263:1369-1371.
ABSTRACT

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial
R. A. McNutt; A. T. Evans; R. H. Fletcher; S. W. Fletcher
JAMA. 1990;263:1371-1376.
ABSTRACT

Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts
J. M. Garfunkel; E. E. Lawson; H. J. Hamrick; M. H. Ulshen
JAMA. 1990;263:1376-1378.
ABSTRACT

The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence
K. Dickersin
JAMA. 1990;263:1385-1389.
ABSTRACT

What can and should be done to reduce publication bias? The perspective of an editor
D. W. Sharp
JAMA. 1990;263:1390-1391.
ABSTRACT

Minimizing the three stages of publication bias
T. C. Chalmers; C. S. Frank; D. Reitman
JAMA. 1990;263:1392-1395.
ABSTRACT

A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials
I. Chalmers; M. Adams; K. Dickersin; J. Hetherington; W. Tarnow-Mordi; C. Meinert; S. Tonascia; T. C. Chalmers
JAMA. 1990;263:1401-1405.
ABSTRACT

Underreporting research is scientific misconduct
I. Chalmers
JAMA. 1990;263:1405-1408.
ABSTRACT

Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication
P. J. Friedman
JAMA. 1990;263:1416-1419.
ABSTRACT

The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature
M. P. Pfeifer; G. L. Snodgrass
JAMA. 1990;263:1420-1423.
ABSTRACT

The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. The Stephen E. Breuning case
E. Garfield; A. Welljams-Dorof
JAMA. 1990;263:1424-1426.
ABSTRACT

Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health
E. I. Cantekin; T. W. McGuire; R. L. Potter
JAMA. 1990;263:1427-1430.
ABSTRACT

Comparison of research quality guidelines in academic and nonacademic environments
J. J. Nobel
JAMA. 1990;263:1435-1437.
ABSTRACT

The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation
D. F. Horrobin
JAMA. 1990;263:1438-1441.
ABSTRACT

The cystic fibrosis gene: medical and social implications for heterozygote detection
B. S. Wilfond; N. Fost
JAMA. 1990;263:2777-2783.