JAMA -- Table of Contents (Vol. 272 No. 2, July 13, 1994)

You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

Table of Contents

ARTICLES

The Second International Congress on Peer Review in BiomedicalPublication
D. Rennie; A. Flanagin
JAMA. 1994;272:91.

The 2nd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Proceedings. Chicago, Illinois, September 9-11, 1993
JAMA. 1994;272:91-173.

Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review
H. F. Judson
JAMA. 1994;272:92-94.

Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable
J. P. Kassirer; E. W. Campion
JAMA. 1994;272:96-97.

Evaluating peer reviews. Pilot testing of a grading instrument
I. D. Feurer; G. J. Becker; D. Picus; E. Ramirez; M. D. Darcy; M. E. Hicks
JAMA. 1994;272:98-100.
ABSTRACT

Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature
M. K. Cho; L. A. Bero
JAMA. 1994;272:101-104.
ABSTRACT

Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts
M. Abby; M. D. Massey; S. Galandiuk; H. C. Polk Jr
JAMA. 1994;272:105-107.
ABSTRACT

Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal
P. A. Rochon; J. H. Gurwitz; C. M. Cheung; J. A. Hayes; T. C. Chalmers
JAMA. 1994;272:108-113.
ABSTRACT

Inappropriate and appropriate selection of 'peers' in grant review
S. A. Glantz; L. A. Bero
JAMA. 1994;272:114-116.
ABSTRACT

Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality?
A. C. Justice; J. A. Berlin; S. W. Fletcher; R. H. Fletcher; S. N. Goodman
JAMA. 1994;272:117-119.
ABSTRACT

Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine
J. C. Roberts; R. H. Fletcher; S. W. Fletcher
JAMA. 1994;272:119-121.
ABSTRACT

Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials
D. Moher; C. S. Dulberg; G. A. Wells
JAMA. 1994;272:122-124.
ABSTRACT

Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals
K. F. Schulz; I. Chalmers; D. A. Grimes; D. G. Altman
JAMA. 1994;272:125-128.
ABSTRACT

Transfer of technology from statistical journals to the biomedical literature. Past trends and future predictions
D. G. Altman; S. N. Goodman
JAMA. 1994;272:129-132.
ABSTRACT

Publication bias and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke
L. A. Bero; S. A. Glantz; D. Rennie
JAMA. 1994;272:133-136.
ABSTRACT

Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions
J. M. Garfunkel; M. H. Ulshen; H. J. Hamrick; E. E. Lawson
JAMA. 1994;272:137-138.
ABSTRACT

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
J. R. Gilbert; E. S. Williams; G. D. Lundberg
JAMA. 1994;272:139-142.
ABSTRACT

The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review
M. Fisher; S. B. Friedman; B. Strauss
JAMA. 1994;272:143-146.
ABSTRACT

A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review
D. N. Laband; M. J. Piette
JAMA. 1994;272:147-149.
ABSTRACT

Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language
M. Nylenna; P. Riis; Y. Karlsson
JAMA. 1994;272:149-151.
ABSTRACT

How well does a journal's peer review process function? A survey of authors' opinions
B. J. Sweitzer; D. J. Cullen
JAMA. 1994;272:152-153.
ABSTRACT

Ethics, economics, and the publication policies of major medical journals
K. Schulman; D. P. Sulmasy; D. Roney
JAMA. 1994;272:154-156.
ABSTRACT

Peer review in journals indexed in Index Medicus
L. A. Colaianni
JAMA. 1994;272:156-158.
ABSTRACT

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis
R. W. Scherer; K. Dickersin; P. Langenberg
JAMA. 1994;272:158-162.
ABSTRACT

Authors' criteria for selecting journals
E. Frank
JAMA. 1994;272:163-164.
ABSTRACT

Is there a case for an international medical scientific press council?
D. G. Altman; I. Chalmers; A. Herxheimer
JAMA. 1994;272:166-167.
ABSTRACT

Scientific misconduct in environmental science and toxicology
H. N. Nigg; G. Radulescu
JAMA. 1994;272:168-170.
ABSTRACT

The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case
W. P. Whitely; D. Rennie; A. W. Hafner
JAMA. 1994;272:170-173.
ABSTRACT